A new Canadian research study revealed intriguing results after analyzing responses from over 500 "incels" (men who are not romantically or sexually involved and identify as involuntarily celibate), in one of the largest surveys conducted on this group often associated with manifestations of hatred or digital violence.

The study, conducted under the supervision of a team of researchers from the University of Waterloo, sought a deeper understanding of the psychological and social motivations that shape the beliefs and behaviors of individuals within this controversial digital community.

Key findings of the study:

Isolation and depression: The results showed that a significant percentage of participants suffer from feelings of isolation and loneliness, facing high levels of anxiety and depression, with a general sense of losing control over their social and emotional lives.

Rejection of violence in general: Contrary to the prevalent stereotype, the majority of respondents reported that they do not support violence against women or others, even though some expressed dissatisfaction with the existing social conditions.

Pessimistic view of relationships: Many participants expressed their loss of hope in the possibility of forming romantic or sexual relationships in the future, attributing this to strict aesthetic standards in society, and a sense of social inferiority.

Need for psychological and social intervention: The study recommended the need to enhance psychological interventions and social policies targeting digitally isolated youth, and to provide platforms for healthy dialogue outside of online extremism circles.

Researchers: No Marginalization or Demonization

The research team emphasized that the goal of the study was not to justify the hostile rhetoric sometimes found in "incel" forums, but rather to provide a deeper understanding of the reasons behind the radicalization of some individuals, as a means to dismantle extremist attitudes and prevent personal frustration from becoming a social threat.

Dr. Dan F. Valley, a co-author of the study, stated:

“What we found is a segment suffering in silence, needing psychological support rather than mere moral condemnation. Ignoring them could be a strategic mistake.”